USPAP and Functional Obsolescence?! You ask, "Tim, haven't you covered this topic here on the podcast, as well as a bunch of other times, places, venues, and symposia?" Yes I surely have. But that

This podcast sports a metaphysical title. "USPAP: Questions and Reflections". Why this title? Who in their right mind wants to think about USPAP? B-O-R-I-N-G! I'll concede that point. But someb

USPAP and the Public Trust is a topic we appraisers do not address all that often. Perhaps we should, since there is confusion on the issue. At the base of this confusion is the fact appraisers thin

When it comes to USPAP and written reports, the response of the typical appraiser is to stifle a yawn. "Who cares about writing reports? We just fill in a form, send it to the client, and hope it do

When you think about USPAP and ROVs (Reconsiderations of Value), gentle and peaceful thoughts are not what come to mind. Somebody wants you to reconsider your value conclusion. That is a gentle way

There's a lot of crap on the Internet about civilization's pending collapse. There is even stuff on the Internet about USPAP and Sasquatch. But there is nothing on the Internet about USPAP and Hot S

WOW! "USPAP, Sasquatch, NAR, and Comparable Sales" is one helluva name for a podcast! That's true, thank you. But given that the ramifications of the Sitzer-Burnett are obvious but still unknown,

USPAP, analysis, and synthesis are terms we do not hear all that often. That's a shame, too. This is because, according to USPAP, a credible appraisal and a non-misleading report are the results of

Give you clients a peek into the future, as well as show your competence!

When it comes to USPAP and a verification model, where is that model? USPAP makes it clear we have to verify the sales data, etc. But USPAP is strangely silent on what to verify means. It is equall