Watch The X22 Report On Video

No videos found (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:17532056201798502,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-9437-3289"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="https://cdn2.decide.dev/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs");pt> Click On Picture To See Larger Picture

The BRICS are struggling, the big boys did not show up. Bezos sells more of his shares. Trump puts a 50% tariff on copper, removes regs and shorten permit time. Costs are coming down because of Trump, the Fed is now trapped, and waiting for the [DS] event. Countries are now using Bitcoin as currency. Trump is now competing with the Fed for currency dominance. Trump played the D’s once again. They took the bait and believe that Trump is hiding something fro them or he is involved with Epstein. Comey and Brennan are now being investigated. The storm has started. Both investigations are connected via Mueller. The coverup always gets you in the end. Multiple agencies investigated the treasonous crimes.

 

Economy

BRICS without the Big Boys becomes a Buzzkill 

• There’s nothing like being an event planner when the big invites that are the “Flagship Speakers” of the event are no shows.  Not just no shows, it is known well in advance they will not be there at all.    Xi, sent a minion, Putin suddenly must suddenly organize his sock drawer, Iran is digging out from the rubble, South Africa doesn’t know what to do without guidance from their new colonial master of China, and Brazil is being put on notice for their mistreatment of President Bolsonaro.

Source: thegatewaypundit.com

(function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:18510697282300316,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-8599-9832"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="https://cdn2.decide.dev/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs");

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1942701909837766924

Copper Spikes to Record High After Trump’s 50 Percent Tariff Announcement

Number of Copper Mines in the US: As of 2023, there are 28 copper mines in operation in the United States, according to GlobalData’s mining database. These mines are primarily located in western states, with Arizona, Utah, New Mexico, Nevada, and Montana accounting for over 99% of domestic copper production.  The tariff, announced to counter imports (primarily from Chile, Canada, and Peru, which supply over 90% of US refined copper imports), may incentivize domestic production but won’t immediately resolve capacity issues. Posts on X suggest US producers might see fatter margins without significantly increasing output due to the time required to develop new mines (years) and smelting constraints.

• Current Production Capacity: In 2024, US copper mine production was approximately 1.17 million metric tons, a slight decline from previous years (1.3 million tons in 2022). Major producers like Freeport-McMoRan, Rio Tinto, and Grupo Mexico (Asarco) operate key mines such as Morenci (Arizona, 399,100 metric tons in 2023) and Kennecott (Utah, 169,300 metric tons in 2023). These mines are fully operational, but some face challenges like declining ore grades (averaging 0.4% copper compared to 0.6% in Chile) and labor shortages.
•  : While the US has significant copper reserves (estimated at 48 trillion tons), production is limited by long permitting timelines (often decades), environmental regulations, and insufficient smelting/refining capacity. Only two primary smelters operate in the US (Rio Tinto’s Kennecott and Freeport-McMoRan’s Miami), and about 30% of mined copper is exported for processing due to this bottleneck.
•  Several development projects, such as the Cactus Project (Arizona, 49,000 metric tons/year, production expected 2026) and Florence Copper (85 million pounds/year), are in progress but face delays due to permitting and environmental concerns. Trump’s recent executive orders (e.g., March 2025) aim to streamline permitting, which could accelerate projects like Resolution Copper.
•  . Existing mines are operational, but scaling up production is hampered by permitting delays, low ore grades, and limited smelting capacity. The tariff could boost investment in domestic mining, but significant increases in output will take years unless regulatory and infrastructure barriers are addressed.

President Trump has taken steps to streamline the permitting process for mining projects, including copper mines, through executive actions aimed at reducing regulatory delays and expediting approvals. However, he has not outright removed the permitting process. Here’s a concise overview based on available information:

• Executive Order (March 20, 2025): Titled “Immediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production,” this order mandates federal agencies to expedite permitting for mineral production projects, including copper. It requires agencies to compile lists of projects with submitted permit applications within 10 days, identify priority projects for immediate approval or expedited review within another 10 days, and coordinate with the National Energy Dominance Council (NEDC) to streamline processes. The order emphasizes reducing “overbearing federal regulation” to boost domestic mineral production, particularly on federal lands.
•   On April 18, 2025, the Trump administration added 10 mining projects, including copper mines like Rio Tinto’s Resolution Copper Project in Arizona, to the FAST-41 program. This federal initiative, established in 2015, streamlines approvals for critical infrastructure by improving interagency coordination and transparency through the Federal Permitting Dashboard. A second batch of 10 projects, including a copper-nickel mine in Minnesota, was added on May 2, 2025. FAST-41 does not eliminate permitting but shortens timelines by setting clearer schedules and reducing bureaucratic overlap.
•  The administration has pushed for broader permitting reforms, including revising environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Posts on X and web sources indicate Trump’s Department of Energy issued rules in July 2025 to reduce the scope of NEPA reviews, aiming to speed up energy and mining project approvals. These changes don’t remove permitting requirements but aim to compress the timeline, which historically averages 3–7 years for US mines (compared to 2–5 years in Canada and Australia).
•   Trump approved a land swap for the Resolution Copper Mine on April 18, 2025, reversing a Biden-era decision to prioritize Native American concerns. This move, alongside FAST-41 designations, signals a focus on accelerating copper projects, though projects like Resolution still face significant construction timelines (10+ years) and legal challenges from environmental and tribal groups.  

https://twitter.com/DataRepublican/status/1942940926680485898



https://twitter.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1942906218764222533

https://twitter.com/JoeLang51440671/status/1942792270018736503

@JeffPasquino

has been all over this. Gresham’s Law. The easiest and least painful way to remove the FED and get rid of fiat currencies, is to make them COMPETE. Compete with WHO? How about the U.S. Treasury? Treasury Secretary Bessent is talking about the passage of the GENIUS Act in the Senate and soon to be passage in the House too. The GENIUS Act will create the legal framework for a U.S. backed “stablecoin.”

What’s to stop Trump and Treasury Secretary Bessent from issuing a new dollar stablecoin to compete with the Federal Reserve Note. What’s to stop Trump and Bessent from issuing a new dollar backed by gold/bitcoin and putting it on the stablecoin “rail system?” Why not let the “new” dollar compete with the “fiat” dollar? What would the people want more? Fiat dollars or gold/Bitcoin backed dollars? Why not let people choose whether to use the current FED banking system or the peer to peer stablecoin system with no third party control and where transactions are instant? Which system would the people prefer? And what about Treasuries? What do you think the world would prefer, fiat 5/10/30 year treasuries, or gold/bitcoin backed 5/10/30 year treasuries? Can you see how easy it would be to actually get rid of the FED and fiat currency/treasuries? This is the ultimate “handing the power back to the people.” The people would get to choose sound money and that would remove the FED and fiat currency at the same time. The FED would be stuck with all the fiat debt because the Federal Reserve Note belongs to the FED, not the people and nobody would want it anymore. The “new” dollar would belong to the people and they would have control of it using stablecoins. I would also throw in the fact that the FED is going to have their corruption exposed and be found unconstitutional too. Possibility???

Political/Rights

https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status/1942952108241948916

(VIDEO) President Trump Says “No Amnesty” but “Work Program” for Illegal Aliens on Farms? – Labor Secretary Calls it a “Concierge Approach” for “Streamlining” Illegal Aliens Through Work Visa Programs

•  
• “There’s no amnesty,” Trump said. “What we’re doing is we’re getting rid of criminals, but we are doing a work program.”
• He added, “we’ve got to give the farmers the people they need, but we’re not talking amnesty.”

Source: thegatewaypundit.com

https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1942668268860498198

https://twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/1942635152758210818

 priority for the public – but not for the guardians, those who control the office, it takes alternative approaches within the information pipeline to breach the protective membrane. Sometimes the information takes time. President Trump is no longer doing rallies, which was the #1 way he was able to ‘sense’ the priorities of the support base. The primary gatekeeper is Susie Wiles. If the subject is not a priority for Wiles, it is not will not easily penetrate the protective bubble.

https://twitter.com/cenkuygur/status/1942675524943503609

https://twitter.com/WarClandestine/status/1942730666057097293

 elements to this situation that we as the public don’t understand. Perhaps a trap is being laid? But one thing is for certain, the Dems/MSM are capitalizing on this moment in an attempt to divide Trump’s base, and it’s working. They have identified a rift in Trump’s support and are amplifying it.

https://twitter.com/AwakenedOutlaw/status/1942712452598341914

The Streisand effect is when an attempt to suppress or censor information backfires, leading to increased public attention and spread of that information. It’s named after Barbra Streisand, who in 2003 tried to block photos of her California home from being published, only for the legal action to draw more attention to the images, causing them to go viral. The effect often occurs when efforts to hide something—like a scandal, mistake, or controversial content—amplify its visibility through media coverage or online sharing, especially on platforms like X where users can quickly spread information.

https://twitter.com/almostjingo/status/1942772184101093773

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1942654992021873081

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1942653394168246464

When it has to do with Trump, when the narrative is there is nothing, and lets not talk about it of the Ds believe that this means Trump is hiding something, they fell right into the trap. Those Ds who are not involved with Epstein believe Trump is moving away from Esptein case because he is involved somehow.

Top Democrats Demand Release of All Epstein Files Naming Trump

• House Democrats are taking action after seeing the MAGA fury over Trump’s Epstein conclusion.
• House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin, along with 15 more of the 19 Democrats on the committee, demanded in a letter Tuesday that Attorney General Pam Bondi release “Epstein file” documents mentioning President Donald Trump.

• The letter, which rails against Bondi for potentially withholding information that would embarrass the president, comes as the Department of Justice earlier this week released a memo closing the case of Jeffrey Epstein, and concluding—to the chagrin of many MAGA hard-liners—that there was no list of clients maintained by the sex offender and disgraced financier.

• It cites former Trump adviser Elon Musk’s June post on X, alleging, during his feud with the president, that Trump “is in the Epstein files.” It also mentions various Trump officials’ vows to release the files, and the administration’s distribution of the “first phase” of Epstein documents to various MAGA influencers in February (documents that turned out to be heavily redacted and largely consisting of already public information).
• The DOJ memo this week, the House Democrats wrote, “raises the question of whether the White House has moved to prevent the declassification and public release of the full Epstein files because they implicate President Trump, and whether these massive redaction efforts and the withholding of the files were intended to shield your boss from embarrassing revelations within those files.”

Source:  newrepublic.com 

Trump wants the enemy to beg for the information. Trump lets forget about it, Ds, fake news, he is hiding something, we demand you release it all

This also applies to the people, the people are now demanding that Epstein info be released.

https://twitter.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1942712099945226351

  = Two-Thirds of ALL VOTERS say Important Ain’t just a MAGA thinga’

 

https://twitter.com/WarClandestine/status/1942761148006207734

 Kash very clearly said that if he had access to evidence showing criminals engaged felonious activity on Epstein island, we would know about it, then proceeds to hint that the evidence we are looking for might be somewhere else. People have been alleging this means Kash is engaged in a cover up, but I think he is trying to tell us that someone else already covered it up, and the evidence is somewhere else. Whether that be the CIA, a different agency, hidden somewhere, another nation’s intelligence agency, destroyed, etc. I think Kash was trying to warn us that the stuff we want about Epstein, and probably a great deal of other topics, is missing from FBI/DOJ records. I don’t think Kash, Bongino, and Bondi are the ones doing the covering up. I think the cover up already happened.

In a national security case in the United States, the agencies involved depend on the nature of the case (e.g., terrorism, espionage, cyber threats, or foreign interference). Here are the primary agencies typically involved:

For a national security case involving espionage and foreign interference in the United States, the following agencies would likely be involved, with their roles tailored to these specific threats:

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI):

• Leads the investigation as the primary agency for counterintelligence and domestic espionage cases.
• Investigates individuals or entities suspected of spying for foreign governments or engaging in foreign interference (e.g., influence operations, election meddling).
• Coordinates through its Counterintelligence Division and field offices.

Central Intelligence Agency (CIA):

• Provides foreign intelligence on the activities of foreign governments or their operatives involved in espionage or interference.
• Works overseas to gather intelligence or disrupt foreign operations but has no domestic law enforcement role.

National Security Agency (NSA):

• Monitors and collects signals intelligence (SIGINT) to detect communications related to espionage or foreign interference.
• Supports cyber investigations if interference involves cyberattacks or digital espionage.

Department of Justice (DOJ):

• Oversees legal actions, including prosecutions for espionage (e.g., under the Espionage Act) or violations of foreign agent laws (e.g., FARA).
• The National Security Division leads coordination on legal and policy matters.

Department of Homeland Security (DHS):

• Involved if foreign interference targets critical infrastructure (e.g., elections, power grids).
• The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) counters cyber-based interference, such as hacking or disinformation campaigns.
• DHS may also investigate visa fraud or border-related issues tied to espionage.

Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI):

• Facilitates intelligence-sharing among agencies to ensure a unified response.
• May analyze foreign interference campaigns through entities like the Foreign Malign Influence Center.

Department of State:

• Handles diplomatic responses, such as expelling foreign diplomats involved in espionage.
• Coordinates with foreign governments if the case involves allies or international agreements.
• The Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR) may provide diplomatic intelligence.

Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA):

• Involved if espionage targets military secrets or involves foreign military actors.
• Provides intelligence on foreign military capabilities or intentions.

Department of Defense (DoD):

• Engages if espionage compromises military systems, personnel, or contractors.
• U.S. Cyber Command may respond to cyber espionage targeting DoD networks.

Federal Election Commission (FEC) or Election Assistance Commission (EAC) (if election-related):

• Support investigations into foreign interference in elections, though their roles are limited to regulatory oversight.
• CISA and FBI take the lead on election security.

DOGE

https://twitter.com/lindayaX/status/1942957094811951197

Linda Yaccarino

After two incredible years, I’ve decided to step down as CEO of