California SLAPP Law

California SLAPP Law


SLAPP032 – The 3 Most-Often Miscited Anti-SLAPP Cases

June 20, 2021

California SLAPP Law


We begin Episode 32 with the discussion of how Morris & Stone just defeated an anti-SLAPP motion. I reveal the common (and fatal) mistake made by defense counsel when they pursue anti-SLAPP motions.


And on the topic of mistakes, based on my prior article, we turn to the three cases that counsel almost always cite improperly when defending against an anti-SLAPP motion. Listen and find out what these three cases really stand for:


Nguyen-Lam v. Cao (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 858.


Weinberg v. Feisel (2003) 110 Cal.App.4th 1122.


Flatley v. Mauro (2006) 39 Cal.4th 299.


Finally, in the after-show, I reveal a successful strategy to obtain a trial continuance, even when the judge has already said no.


The post SLAPP032 – The 3 Most-Often Miscited Anti-SLAPP Cases appeared first on California SLAPP Law.


loaded