Episode 247-Fee Reductions Gaining Ground Also Available OnSearchable Podcast Transcript Gun Lawyer — Episode 247 Transcript

SUMMARY KEYWORDS

Second Amendment, carry permit fees, New Jersey, gun rights, NRA ILA, Citizens Committee, gun control, adolescent firearm deaths, National Shooting Sports Foundation, JAMA Pediatrics, self- defense, transporting firearms, school property ban, gun laws, gun rights oppression.

SPEAKERS

Teddy Nappen, Speaker 2, Evan Nappen

Evan Nappen 00:15 I’m Evan Nappen.

Teddy Nappen 00:16 And I’m Teddy Nappen.

Evan Nappen 00:18
and welcome to Gun Lawyer. So, you know, we live in a tough environment, in New Jersey, where the gun rights oppressors are constantly going at us and the fight seems to be eternal. However, in one area, we are making positive gains, and every little bit counts. This is important because this affects us in the big picture as well. And what I’m talking about was reported a few shows ago from our good friend, John Petrolino, who had talked about Englishtown reducing permit fees by doing refunds on carry permit fees. As you may know, the Carry Killer bill, which was put forward in the kicking and screaming hissy fit by Murphy and the Democrats after the great Bruen decision, making it so permits have to be shall issue and issued by states. One of the provisions in there was to raise the two-year carry permit fee to a whopping $200. But in so doing, the legislation that passed allocated that 75% of that fee, $150, goes to the municipality that processes the carry permit application.

Evan Nappen 01:50
As you may recall, the town of Englishtown that apparently and obviously respects the Second Amendment, on their own, passed a town ordinance to refund residents their portion of the $200 fee. So,$150 was refunded back to applicants because the fee is excessive, and it is detrimental to our exercise of Second Amendment rights, which was, of course, the intention of the Second Amendment oppressors in passing the law. I’m happy to report, and this is from an article by our good friend, Cam Edwards, at the great pro-gun news site called BearingArms. (https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2025/07/17/third-new-jersey-town-votes-to-return-concealed- carry-fees-to-gun-owners-n1229293)

Evan Nappen 02:52
A third New Jersey town has now voted to return concealed carry fees. So, first we had Englishtown do it, and then with support of Second Amendment groups like the NRA-ILA and Citizens Committee, there
Page – 1 – of 10
was this push that is ongoing, and Franklin Township followed Englishtown in refunding fees. And now the Citizens Committee reports, and that’s quoted in the article as follows. “We’re delighted that officials in Dumont, a borough in Bergen County, have adopted Resolution 2025-216 to eliminate the municipal portion of the permit fee.” “State lawmakers set the high permit fee in an effort to discourage average citizens from applying for carry permits. We have joined forces with our friends at NRA/ILA and NJFOS in an effort to provide relief, and we’re happy to say it’s beginning to work.” And that is encouraging. This is the beginning of a movement to get positive action regarding the exercise of our Second Amendment rights.

Evan Nappen 04:22
This is very important because not only does it make it more reasonable in terms of pricing, but it also is going to help out in the challenge to the excessive fees which is currently going on. There’ll be other challenges as well, and the fact that towns themselves are objecting to this and helping their own residents is just fantastic. So, we can do this town by town. Every town that joins is another statement in support of the Second Amendment. So, my congratulations to Englishtown, Franklin, and Dumont. The march is continuing to defending our Second Amendment rights and our right to defend ourselves and not be victims of crime, but rather defenders against those who wish to do ourselves and our loved ones harm. So, this is a great step forward. Now I also . . . go ahead.

Teddy Nappen 05:38
I was going to ask. I’ve never once heard of a Government authority refusing money.

Evan Nappen 05:45
Isn’t that even, just that alone is so refreshing that it’s mind boggling. That they would return any money, right?

Evan Nappen 05:53
Right! No one does that. What are you crazy? And of course, when the Second Amendment oppressors passed the law, they thought that no town would ever turn away money. But they are wrong, and now it actually gives a platform for towns to express their support of our rights. So, it’s actually having a reverse effect, and it’s great to see.

Teddy Nappen 05:53
That’s right out of that in the Cinderella Man, when the boxer goes to the welfare office and gives them back money. Like it’s . . .

Evan Nappen 06:32
Now here’s another interesting news bit that I want to mention, also directly affecting New Jersey and the broader political dynamic that the lame stream media tries to shove down our throats. This is an article from Breitbart, another excellent news source. (https://www.breitbart.com/2nd- amendment/2025/07/16/report-stricter-gun-control-states-lead-in-adolescent-firearm-deaths/) This is written by Awr Hawkins. Hawkins is a great gun writer, and he writes a lot for Breitbart. He has cool articles, and I always love his stuff. The title of the article is “Report: Stricter Gun Control States Lead In Adolescent Firearm Deaths”. This news article has two very important factors to it. The article
Page – 2 – of 10
discusses that the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), which is a national group that fights for gun rights and focuses on industry issues that directly affect our gun rights. They took a look at what was in June, 2025, and it was published in the Journal for American Medical Association Pediatrics, known as JAMA Pediatrics. The title of the study is “Firearm Laws and Pediatric Mortality in the US”.

Evan Nappen 08:01
In this study, the authors looked at three groups in terms of grouping states, as far as their gun laws are concerned: strict, permissive, and most permissive. Now, guess where New Jersey falls into that? I bet you don’t have to guess real hard. You got a one out of three shot, folks. You’re right. It’s strict. The authors then claimed, now this is from the authors of that article, “. . . permissive firearm laws contributed to thousands of excess firearm deaths among children living in states with permissive policies; future work should focus on determining which types of laws conferred the most harm and which offered the most protection.”

Evan Nappen 08:47
Now JAMA is, of course, part of the gun rights oppression movement. They were purposely, doctors and the medical staff were purposely brought in. We’re going to talk about this in a little more detail later. So, big shock that JAMA says, oh my, you know, we have any of these permissive states, it’s causing more deaths to kids. Except for one problem. Well, I’ll get to that in a minute. Establishment media, of course, like New York Times, ABC News and CNN ran with the author’s claim. Another big shock, right? Like they run with every hoax out there that can support their left wing anti-rights agenda. NSSF points out that these outlets never asked why the study’s authors manipulate the data by using estimated, predicted and crude rate adjusted figures, instead of analyzing the real incidents.

Evan Nappen 10:06
NSSF responded by noting they took a simple look at the raw data of the CDC. The CDC data tells a completely different story. I’ll quote the article. “Rebuilding the data set using the same time, population and mechanism parameters established by the authors using CDC’s data tells a different story entirely. The eight states the authors rated as “Strict” and having the most restrictive gun laws – California, New York, Maryland, Rhode Island, Illinois, Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Jersey . . .” Of course. “. . . on average saw more unadjusted adolescent firearm mortality than the 11 “Permissive and 30 “Most Permissive” states.” So, there you go, folks.

Evan Nappen 11:15
It is nothing but a lie perpetrated by those that want to oppress our rights and use the children as an excuse to further restrict freedom. And then do it in the name of safety, which, of course, it has nothing to do with safety. In fact, if that’s really what they wanted to do, then New Jersey would make its laws the “most permissive” as to what the data actually reflects. And in fact, New Jersey’s gun laws, since the most deaths occur in the strict states, are arguably contributing to more deaths. That’s right. Look what the data says. I mean, if they want to make a link between this data, then the reverse is also true. Those states with more gun laws have more kids dying. So, those states that heavily restrict firearms need to go permissive and/or more permissive. Analysis of the propaganda from the gun rights oppressors is very important, and I’m glad to see that NSSF stepped up to the plate and took a hard look at the facts and the reality of the situation, and that Cam Ewards of Bearing Arms, has put that out
Page – 3 – of 10
for us to better understand the propaganda against our rights that we face. I have a letter here. Yeah, go ahead, Teddy.

Teddy Nappen 13:05
I would say, just as well. They would always try to. I know I’ve seen a lot of the Democrats and the gun rights oppressors always say, oh, all the violent shootings, all the violent attacks are going on in the red states. And if you zoom in on the map. Where is it? Of course. Of course, it’s the Blue City strongholds. When you ever look at like Memphis or any of the like in the middle of the red states, there’s a nice blue blip, and that’s where it’s run by Democrats, controlled Democrat run through, in and throughout, and those have the highest amount of murder rates.

Evan Nappen 13:39
Basically, it’s the urban Democrat controlled cities that actually ruin it for the states. And the states that have the largest cities are the states with the most gun rights oppression, because the cities can often dominate the state legislatures, and that’s how they pass their liberal left agenda. It’s not just on guns, but on so many things that end up harming our country. We see that all the time. So, yeah, good point. Look for those blue bastions of oppression. That’s, uh, who’s screwing us over.

Evan Nappen 14:20
I have a letter here from Jack regarding self-defense from dangerous animals and wildlife. Hi, Evan. I love your show. I listen to it regularly, and it’s packed with useful knowledge and tips. I have two questions that I would like to ask you. One, what are the rules for engaging dangerous wild animals in self-defense? For example, if one uses their CCW on the side of the road or in a forested area to prevent harm from a dangerous animal, and in the process, the animal dies, what should one do? Are there specific laws regarding this in New Jersey?

Evan Nappen 14:54
So, what we’ve seen in terms of actual self-defense when threatened by wild animals. There is some case law that I’ve been able to successfully use to argue that self-defense, although focused on defense of persons, can still be applied to defense in animals. And of course, the defense that you’re doing is to a bona fide threat to your person or to that of another. Then you have that ability to protect yourself. It is that ability of self-defense that is not only enshrined in our statutory law, but is even found in the Supreme Court decisions on Second Amendment. It’s also our right to self-defense. And don’t take that lightly, because in many so-called civilized nations, they ban self-defense. They ban the use of a firearm in self-defense, and often it is the defender, not the bad guy, that ends up being criminalized and sanctioned in the criminal justice system for having the nerve to defend themselves or their loved ones. But here we do have a right to self-defense.

Evan Nappen 16:05
And question two, when transporting firearms to the range, does ammo need to be in a separate container, or can it be within a separate compartment within the same range bag, but a completely separate lock on the firearm being locked in a separate compartment with a different lock and key code? Okay, here’s the deal in New Jersey. We’re not talking about interstate transport under Title 18, 926 A. That’s where ammunition has to be separate. You want to have it in a separate container. I’d
Page – 4 – of 10
advise that the container be secured and closed and locked, and if you are gun transport, make sure that’s in a locked box.

Evan Nappen 16:39
But what I’m talking about is New Jersey’s exemptions. New Jersey’s exemptions are found under N.J.S. 2C:39-6, and throughout those exemptions, the ones that civilian citizens use the most, subsection e. and subsection f. Those deal with possession in one’s home, transporting to the range, transporting while hunting, etc. When transporting pursuant to exemptions, you go to subsection g., which mandates how one is to transport their firearms. Number one, the gun has to be unloaded and has to be in either a closed and fastened case, in a gun box, in a locked trunk, that should be locked in a trunk, or in a securely tied wrapper. The only criteria under New Jersey law is that the gun be unloaded. Ammunition itself in New Jersey does not have to be in a separate container. It’s a good idea to have it in a separate container. But in theory, you could take your unloaded gun, put it in a gun case, and dump a box of loose rounds right on top of the gun. As long as the gun is unloaded, shut the case, and you’re technically legal in New Jersey.

Evan Nappen 17:53
Now, I don’t recommend doing that, but it’s just to illustrate. In New Jersey, the law simply stipulates the gun must be unloaded. It does not say that the ammo has to be transported in a separate, locked container or in a separate manner. However, it’s advisable to do that because, although not required by law, it makes an excellent statement as to your responsibility in your transportation of ammo and firearms. And you know, it means going that extra step just to show, again, not legally required, but showing just how responsible you are. Should push ever come to shove and we need to get some gun charge dropped by a prosecutor, it’s a lot better to say that your ammo was secured in such a manner and everything was separate. Thank you, Jack, for that question.

Teddy Nappen 18:45
I will also say to kind of add to that. It was a previous GOFU where I think it was a guy pulling up to pick up his kid. He had unloaded his gun, and one of the ammo was loose and it fell out of the car.

Evan Nappen 18:58
Good point, Teddy. And that’s always a possibility, too. So, I often will advise that you have the ammo boxes that hold each individual round, like MTM, or even the factory box. This way, not only is your ammunition stored very nicely, you actually know that every single round is accounted for and that you haven’t dropped loose rounds. So, you haven’t accidentally left a round in the magazine or the gun. And this way, it is a double check, a kind of a fail safe, double check, that always lets you know the ammunition quantity you have and that you’ve properly accounted for it. So, that is good stuff.

Evan Nappen 19:40
Then we have a question here from Jason, regarding CCW question. I was considering getting my CCW, and I work for a public school system. I’ve gotten mixed messages whether I can park in the school lot, unload and store the weapon while sitting in the truck. This is the only reason I haven’t gotten it. I don’t want to get it just for the weekends. Thank you. Well, unfortunately, in New Jersey, there are two sections that prohibit guns in a school zone. One is a “sensitive place” that does, in fact,
Page – 5 – of 10
instruct that in a parking lot, you can do that. But the problem is the other school property ban that was in place even before “sensitive places”. It does not have such an exemption. So, do not possess your firearm even unloaded and locked and cased on school property, meaning the parking lot, because there are two prohibitions there. And that’s where the confusion is setting in. Our legislature did a terrible service, not surprisingly, because individuals may think they’re okay if they’re just following the “sensitive place” rules, when in fact, there is a standalone separate under N.J.S. 2C:39-5e. that just bans guns flat out on school property. It doesn’t exempt for the parking lots. So, good question. Don’t become a GOFU on that one.

Evan Nappen 21:02
Hey, let me mention our good friends at WeShoot. WeShoot is our indoor range in Lakewood, New Jersey, conveniently located right off the Parkway. That’s where Teddy and I both shoot. It’s where we got our training and certifications, and you can, too. They have a fantastic pro shop and a great range. They have specials on guns, great deals, great trainers, and a wonderful, wonderful environment. They treat everyone like family. You’ll love it there. You’ll love it there. Go to WeShoot in Lakewood. You can check out their website at weshootusa.com. Tell them that Evan and Teddy sent you. You will be glad you did. It is a great resource. Every one of our ranges are a treasure. We need places to shoot in crowded New Jersey and having a fantastic facility like WeShoot is just an awesome resource that you can take advantage of. Go there and shoot. Go to weshootusa.com and check out their website. Beautiful photography. And of course, they have the WeShoot girls, too. And if you want to look at them, you have my permission. I highly advise you checking out WeShoot.

Evan Nappen 22:11
I also want to mention our good friends at the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs, the premier gun rights defender group in New Jersey. You need to be a member of your state Association. They’re the official NRA affiliate. They’re the guys that have the full time paid lobbyist in Trenton keeping an eye on New Jersey’s shenanigans and letting you know what further oppression they have in mind for us. What’s the next BOHICA (Bend Over – Hear It Comes Again) that the Democrats and Murphy want to do to us? Jump on a membership of the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs. It’s ANJRPC.org. Join them and be part of the solution. When you do, you’ll get the email alerts that will tell you what’s going on and give you easy things you can do to make your voice heard and become part of the fight. It’s well worth it. You’ll stay on top of the events, and you’ll know that you’re doing your part. Go to anjrpc.org and join today.

Evan Nappen 23:15
And let me also mention my book, New Jersey Gun Law. It is the Bible of New Jersey gun law, and it is a way for you to keep yourself from becoming a GOFU. By getting the book, you will receive not only 500 pages of New Jersey gun law, but 120 topics, question and answer. It is the only source written in this manner to explain the incredible matrix of New Jersey gun laws. It will help you tremendously. One important thing. When you get the book, don’t loan it, because I keep hearing about people never getting it back. So, keep your copy. If you want to get another one for your friend, buy one. Don’t give up yours. You’ll be sorry if you do. And when you get your book, scan the QR code on the front, and make sure you get the subscription for free. It’s private to my database there, where I can send you out all the updates of laws as they pass or change. You will immediately have access to the archives, and
Page – 6 – of 10
you can download instantly the 2025 Comprehensive Update, which has a standalone chapter on “sensitive places”. So, you will know where you can and can’t carry. Go to EvanNappen.com, EvanNappen.com. You’ll see the big orange book. Click it and order your copy today. So, Teddy, tell us, what do you have in Press Checks?

Teddy Nappen 24:35
Well, as you know, Press Checks are always free, and this is something that’s kind of been. It’s just been bugging the crap out of me. Every time you go into the doctors, what is the one question they always ask? Do you possess firearms? And I know you addressed this before, and it was actually in that. The origin was with Josh Sugarman. He was, you know, the closet hoplosexual, who created and pushed for that, too.

Evan Nappen 25:07
That’s correct. I was there when he actually had the nerve to come to the Gun Rights Policy Conference. He was spotted there, and he was given the ultimatum. You can leave now, or you can talk to the group. And he chose, to his credit, to speak to all these pro-gunners. And he didn’t hold back. He laid it out, and this was at the time of Hillary Clinton. He laid out how he was going to make guns a national health issue, to ride along the coattails of national healthcare. And they got the doctors on their side. They first got the pediatricians on their side. They were the first group to go along with the anti-gun, gun rights oppression movement. Since then, they’ve moved through doctors. They’ve got it now to where doctors, as you point out, Teddy, ask you whether you have guns. It’s not a medical issue. It’s none of their freaking business whether you have a gun or not. And this is, of course, data based and something that creates a problem. And just think, New Jersey asks on the gun application about medical conditions. Well, now we got doctors asking about your guns. Don’t you see the link, folks? I think you do.

Teddy Nappen 26:24
And when I was going through this kind of research, I was very curious. Was there any like legal mandate, or was this something they just do for the heck of it? I got this one from the PoliticalInsider.com, and it’s by Kathleen Anderson. “Why Do Doctors Ask About Guns? We Explain” (https://thepoliticalinsider.com/doctors-ask-about-guns/) And, of course, it tries to play the midland route where they point out that, unfortunately, yes, they have gotten to the physicians. And this is their mindset. This one guy Emmy Betts an EMT says it’s the same way we encourage people to wear a seat belt and not drive intoxicated. That’s their mindset. They’re asking because they treat it like, oh, owning a gun is a disease, or, you know, you’ve got to wear your safety belt. You shouldn’t own guns. You got to wear your safety belt.

Evan Nappen 27:15
You know, the last time I went to the doctor. In the survey they make you do, it didn’t ask, does your car have a safety belt in it? Do you drive intoxicated? You know, they don’t ask that actually. You know. That may be where they’re coming from, arguably, in trying to rationalize their gun rights oppression. But I didn’t see those questions.
Page – 7 – of 10
Teddy Nappen 27:38
And I will give the article credit as well because it gives you a clear insight as to what they think. You have a Dr. Mark Rosenberg of the CDC, who says we need to revolutionize the way we look at guns. We did it with cigarettes. We used to be that smoking was a glamor symbol, cool, sexy, macho. Now it is dirty, deadly and banned. So, they’re trying to equate it now to cigarettes.

Evan Nappen 28:11
Well, arguably, their position is that cigarettes cause cancer, and if we accept that, then cancer is actually a disease. And last I heard, doctors may have an interest in diseases, but guns are not a disease. As much as the gun rights oppressors may want to call it that, it’s not. It’s a right. In fact, it’s something that helps us protect ourselves, and it is something that is a natural fundamental right, a God given right that we not only exercise to defend ourselves. It also is something our Founding Fathers recognized as being incredibly important to the preservation of liberty and that’s why it’s the Second Amendment. Only before that is religious freedom and freedom of speech, because without God and without freedom of speech to be able to tell us our rights, you’re not even going to know your rights. So, they put the Second Amendment way up there for a reason. It’s not a disease, and doctors need to lay off the politics of gun rights oppression.

Teddy Nappen 29:39
Actually, it’s pretty funny that you mentioned free speech because there was a very clearly anti-gun article from the Health.HowStuffWorks.com by Patrick Kiger. (https://health.howstuffworks.com/medicine/healthcare/us-doctors-cant-ask-patients-gun- ownership.htm) He brought up, and I didn’t even realize this. Florida actually tried to ban and restrict doctors from asking if patients had firearms.

Evan Nappen 30:01 Yes!

Teddy Nappen 30:01
It was the “docs versus Glocks” case, and I was shocked. The appeals court struck it down because it said it violated the doctor’s free speech. Um . . .

Evan Nappen 30:01
Well, there you go. It violates their free speech so that they can inform on you to the Government. Well, there you go. And, you know, if you think that you actually have privacy with your medical records, that’s a joke. I can’t tell you how many cases where we’re fighting for gun permits that medical confidentiality gets routinely penetrated. It’s asked about on the firearm application. Please don’t think you actually have that privacy, because when it comes to guns, that’s a joke. It’s a joke.

Evan Nappen 30:48
Hey, so we have today’s GOFU. The moment you’ve all been waiting for. The Gun Owner Fuck Up of the week. This comes as a letter, an Ask Evan letter, but it really highlights a GOFU. And not that this person committed a GOFU, but he does highlight it. And this is from Chris, regarding automobile graphics, stickers, and license plates. My comment/question is on automobile graphics and even
Page – 8 – of 10
license plates. Could the following be a Gun Owner F Up, or even just a general F Up? I think you referenced the topic in the previous show, which got me thinking. Number one, I saw a human stick figure graphic on the back window of an SUV. Often one sees these stick figures portraying a family or a group of people with humorous comments or actions. This particular graphic showed stick figures being mowed down by an automobile, stick figures and legs flying in the air, etc. Then he saw a bumper sticker that said, Keep honking. I’m reloading. And three, a vanity plate with the abbreviated word double tap. I believe this references a defensive shooting strategy where one shoots twice in rapid succession. If these people were ever in a self-defense situation, gun owner, otherwise, would the slogans or graphics be a problem in court? Further, if the owner of the vehicle makes a mistake, negligent or otherwise, and causes bodily harm to someone.

Evan Nappen 32:14
So, let me tell you. This raises a very valid point. I am totally in favor of free speech. I get the humor of these things. I totally do. But the problem is, if you get into a licensing battle on your character or if you end up in a situation where you defended yourself, there’s nothing better the State likes to point out to a jury, if they can get away with it, is that you’re somehow a nut, or that you are out looking for trouble, or that you are eager to cause death and mayhem. And so this can, in fact, be a problem. I recommend against it. Plus it may also lead to unnecessary inquiries. If you’re stopped for motor vehicle violations, minor violations, it may then lead to, are there any guns in the car? And why are they asking that? Well, I saw your sign that says, Stop honking. I’m reloading. So, there you go. Or, you know, as much as I like to have our symbols of what we love, like the NRA, the Association and other great gun groups on our car, when you do that, you open yourself up to trouble.

Evan Nappen 33:22
There’s been the same, not just in guns. People have, you know, a deadhead sticker on their car, and then next thing you know, they’re focused on for things that may be associated with that group. All kinds of it. You have to think with one very important word, especially when it comes to New Jersey, and that word is be discrete. The word is discrete or discretion. You need to be discreet. And if you do these things, you’re opening yourself up. That’s another reason that I do not recommend having certain firearms with names on them that portray something problem. Because I guarantee you this, if your self- defense handgun is a Death Slayer 2000, I guarantee that the entire trial, your self-defense trial, the prosecutor is not going to call it your self-defense handgun, but rather your Death Slayer 2000. This is what will happen, and you don’t want to give that opportunity as well. So, this is why, when there’s shotguns out there called the Persuader, there’s different things, you know, Vigilante and other stuff. And you know, these things may be cool, and I get it. They’re fun, but it can be detrimental. It can be used against you.

Evan Nappen 34:51
Remember, when we’re dealing with jury trials, we’re dealing with 12 people who aren’t smart enough to avoid jury duty, right? I mean, think about what’s their exposure to guns? They don’t understand our culture and our humor, and they’ll use it against you. Same with these judges. Many of these judges don’t understand anything about guns, and so, it is absolutely a problem and a GOFU. I would highly, highly suggest being very discreet as to those issues.
Page – 9 – of 10
Teddy Nappen 35:21
What you could do is instead show them reason.

Evan Nappen 35:25
Well, that is something. But, you know, if you always use reason and always let the folks listen to reason. That’s important. Because reason is nonviolent, okay? But short of that, please be careful, be discreet. Think tactically. This is Evan Nappen and Teddy Nappen reminding you that gun laws don’t protect honest citizens from criminals. They protect criminals from honest citizens.

Speaker 2 35:56
Gun Lawyer is a CounterThink Media production. The music used in this broadcast was managed by Cosmo Music, New York, New York. Reach us by emailing Evan@gun.lawyer. The information and opinions in this broadcast do not constitute legal advice. Consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Page – 10 – of 10

Downloadable PDF TranscriptGun Lawyer S3 E247_Transcript About The HostEvan Nappen, Esq.

Known as “America’s Gun Lawyer,” Evan Nappen is above all a tireless defender of justice. Author of eight bestselling books and countless articles on firearms, knives, and weapons history and the law, a certified Firearms Instructor, and avid weapons collector and historian with a vast collection that spans almost five decades — it’s no wonder he’s become the trusted, go-to expert for local, industry and national media outlets.

Regularly called on by radio, television and online news media for his commentary and expertise on breaking news Evan has appeared countless shows including Fox News – Judge Jeanine, CNN – Lou Dobbs, Court TV, Real Talk on WOR, It’s Your Call with Lyn Doyle, Tom Gresham’s Gun Talk, and Cam & Company/NRA News.

As a creative arts consultant, he also lends his weapons law and historical expertise to an elite, discerning cadre of movie and television producers and directors, and novelists.

He also provides expert testimony and consultations for defense attorneys across America.

Email Evan Your Comments and Questions 

• talkback@gun.lawyer

Join Evan’s InnerCircleHere’s your chance to join an elite group of the Savviest gun and knife owners in America.  Membership is totally FREE and Strictly CONFIDENTIAL.  Just enter your email to start receiving insider news, tips, and other valuable membership benefits.  

Email (required) *

First Name *

Select list(s) to subscribe toInnerCircle Membership

Yes, I would like to receive emails from Gun Lawyer Podcast. (You can unsubscribe anytime)

Constant Contact Use. Please leave this field blank.var ajaxurl = "https://gun.lawyer/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php";