Darrell Castle talks about the virus and asks the question, “Are the cures proposed for the virus worse than the disease itself”. Transcription / Notes Hello, this is Darrell Castle with today’s Castle Report. Today is Friday, April 17, 2020, and on this Report I will be talking about the virus. What else but the virus and our efforts to fight the World War against our unseen enemy. I want so much to talk about some other issue but there are no issues unrelated to the virus, so it’s all virus, all the time. Here at the Castle household this is day 28 of our house arrest. We are healthy and virus free for now, and so is our daughter, who is still stuck on an island unable to return home for we don’t know how long. The question for today is, “What price victory?”. What will the efforts to fight the virus and to protect us from the virus cost us in terms of money, but more importantly, in terms of human freedom. Will a long-term lockdown save us from the virus, or will it cause more problems than it solves? There can be little doubt that locking ourselves away indefinitely will prevent our getting the virus, but if complete safety were the only issue we could lower the speed limit to 20 mph and we would be safer. Can you run a modern society without any risk? Vaccines are one proposed solution, and the loudest proponent of vaccines as a solution in the world today is Bill Gates, who also funds much of the research and profits from final delivery. Mr. Gates wants to hold the entire world in lockdown for up to 18 months while he develops a vaccine. We would then be required to have his vaccine injected into our bodies and accept a digital certificate to indicate to the world that we are safe. That digital mark would be required for many of the normal functions of life. One of the ideas proposed to solve our virus problems is a long-term lockdown, but let’s look at some of the effects that would have, and is having, on us individually and as a country. Is life simply a bodily function, or is human thriving another element of living? To thrive do we not require some occupation that is meaningful to us. If we have no profession, no occupation that we have prepared many years to perform, don’t we become like the hawks that sit on fenceposts along the interstates waiting for cars and trucks to provide their food. In effect, they are no longer hawks but buzzards just waiting to be fed. Robert Kennedy Jr. has spoken and written extensively about Bill Gates globalist agenda. “Vaccines for Bill Gates are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine related businesses (including Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vaccination ID enterprise and give him dictatorial control of global health policy.” Mr. Kennedy went on to say,” Gates obsession with vaccines seems to be fueled by a conviction to save the world with technology.” So, he’s a messiah, and I suppose he’s very disappointed that he’s not the Messiah. Mr. Kennedy points out that around the turn of this century Mr. Gates took control of India’s National Technical Advisory Group of Immunization, which mandated up to 50 doses of polio vaccines to children before the age of five. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating non-polio acute flaccid paralysis epidemic that paralyzed 490,000 children between 2000 and 2017. The Indian Government asked Gates to leave the country and the rates of paralysis dropped significantly. In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) admitted that the global explosion in polio is predominantly vaccine strain. The worst epidemics in Congo, Afghanistan, and the Philippines are all linked to vaccines. By 2018, according to WHO, 70% of global polio cases were vaccine strain. I could go on for this entire Report on what Mr. Gates’ messianic efforts have accomplished, but I will, for time reasons, mention only a few more. HPV experimental vaccines given to young girls in India’s remote provinces caused severe side effects,